Naming the room is the oldest move in facilitation.
I spent my career designing rooms where people work together. Big rooms, hard problems, real stakes. The first move was always the same: name who is in the room and what they are there to do. Get that right and the agenda almost writes itself.
AI didn't break that rule. It added a new kind of participant. Now the room might be you and a person. You and an agent. A chain of agents with nobody watching. Or an agent walking back in with results and waiting on your call. Four rooms, four sandboxes, and the design changes completely depending on which one you're standing in.
That's the whole trick. A conversation between two people needs trust and time. A handoff to an agent needs a clear brief and a deadline. A chain of agents needs a checkpoint where a human decides. Lump them together as one blurry thing called "using AI" and you end up designing all of them badly.
Here's the claim, and the admission that goes with it. The claim: most teams work in one sandbox all day and never notice. The admission: I still catch myself doing the same thing. The frame isn't a badge you earn once, it's a habit you rebuild every morning. Which meeting on your calendar this week would change if you named who was really on each side?